
WHEN IT COMES TO U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
IS IT TRUE THAT 78 MILLION OF US DO NOT EXIST?
Gary M. Kuhn
St Martin Systems, Inc.
August 6, 2004
WHEN IT COMES TO U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
IS IT TRUE THAT 78 MILLION OF US DO NOT EXIST?
When voting for President, the United States does not use a system of "l person, l vote". Instead, in each state some large number of people is allocated a single "Electoral College" vote.
Each state's Electoral College representation is the same as its
representation in the bicameral Congress. Specifically, each state
receives
- 2 electors, 1 for each Senator from the state, plus
- 1 elector per House district in the state.
The total number of
electors is 538: 100 "Senate" electors plus 435 "House" electors plus 3
electors for Washington D.C.
A problem with this system of representation is that the number of people per electoral vote varies greatly from state to state. In California there is 1 electoral vote for every 615,000 people; in Wyoming, there is 1 electoral vote for every 164,000 people. See the table below.
Assume that an equal percentage of people actually does vote in each state. It follows that in presidential elections a voter in California weighs only 0.27 as much (164/615) as a voter in Wyoming, in his or her electoral contribution.
California and Wyoming illustrate the extremes, but this electoral college system down-weights the largest states generally: a voter in the 25 most populous states weighs only 0.67 as much (378/566) as a voter in the 25 least populous states plus Washington D.C.
Some fail to grasp the significance of this down-weighting. Decreasing the weight of each voter in the 25 most populous states has the same effect as giving full weight to some of those voters but denying the existence of the others. In the Electoral College the result would be the same: down-weighting a population by a fraction has the same effect as pretending that some number of people does not exist.
Specifically, by decreasing the weight of persons in the 25 most populous states such that they weigh only 0.67 as much, their effective population is reduced to 157 million, one-third less than the 235 million people in those states: i.e. in the Electoral College, it is as though 78 million of these people do not exist.
Looked at in this way, the 21 most populous states suffer a population loss of 64.5 million people. That number is greater than the total population in the other 29 states plus Washington D.C., which is only 63.7 million people:

If the United States' government decided that in presidential elections, it was going to pretend that all the people in the 29 states with the smallest populations plus Washington D.C. do not exist, I believe the public would not stand for it. Yet, when the government pretends that a greater number of people does not exist in the 21 most populous states, does anybody care?
Technically, this problem could be solved by dropping the 2 senatorial electors per state, since the number of people per House district is roughly equal in all states. See the last column of the table below. The political likelihood of such a solution is another matter.
D=Democrat
Electoral R=Republican Popn/ Popn/
Population Votes Senate House Electoral House
State census 2000 81-90 01-10 D:R D:R Vote Vote
01 California 33,871,648 47 55 2:0 33:20 615848 639087
02 Texas 20,851,820 29 34 0:2 16:16 613288 651619
03 New York 18,976,457 36 31 2:0 19:10 612144 654360
04 Florida 15,982,378 21 27 2:0 7:18 591939 639295
05 Illinois 12,419,293 24 21 1:1 9:10 591395 653647
06 Pennsylvania 12,281,054 25 21 0:2 7:12 584812 646371
07 Ohio 11,353,140 23 20 0:2 6:12 567657 630730
08 Michigan 9,938,444 20 17 2:0 6:9 584614 662562
09 New Jersey 8,414,350 16 15 2:0 7:6 560957 647257
10 Georgia 8,186,453 12 15 1:1 5:8 545763 629727
11 North Carolina 8,049,313 13 15 1:1 6:7 536621 619177
12 Virginia 7,078,515 12 13 0:2 3:8 544501 643501
13 Massachusetts 6,349,097 13 12 2:0 10:0 529091 634909
14 Indiana 6,080,485 12 11 1:1 3:6 552771 675609
15 Washington 5,894,121 10 11 2:0 6:3 538829 654902
16 Tennessee 5,689,283 11 11 0:2 5:4 517208 632142
17 Missouri 5,595,211 11 11 0:2 4:5 508656 621690
18 Wisconsin 5,363,675 11 10 2:0 4:4 536368 670459
19 Maryland 5,296,486 10 10 2:0 6:2 529649 662060
20 Arizona 5,130,632 7 10 0:2 2:6 513063 641329
21 Minnesota 4,919,479 10 10 1:1 4:4 491948 614934
22 Louisiana 4,468,976 10 9 2:0 3:4 496553 638425
23 Alabama 4,447,100 9 9 0:2 2:5 494122 635300
24 Colorado 4,301,261 8 9 0:2 2:5 477918 614465
25 Kentucky 4,041,769 9 8 0:2 2:4 505221 673628
26 South Carolina 4,012,012 8 8 1:1 2:4 501502 668668
27 Oklahoma 3,450,654 8 7 0:2 1:4 492951 690130
28 Oregon 3,421,399 7 7 1:1 4:1 488771 684279
29 Connecticut 3,405,565 8 7 2:0 2:3 486509 684279
30 Iowa 2,926,324 8 7 1:1 1:4 418046 585264
31 Mississippi 2,844,658 7 6 0:2 2:2 474110 711164
32 Kansas 2,688,418 7 6 0:2 1:3 448070 672104
33 Arkansas 2,673,400 6 6 2:0 3:1 445567 668350
34 Utah 2,233,169 5 5 0:2 1:2 446634 744389
35 Nevada 1,998,257 4 5 1:1 1:2 399651 666085
36 New Mexico 1,819,046 5 5 1:1 1:2 363809 606348
37 West Virginia 1,808,344 6 5 2:0 2:1 361167 602781
38 Nebraska 1,711,263 5 5 1:1 0:3 342253 570421
39 Idaho 1,293,953 4 4 0:2 0:2 323488 646976
40 Maine 1,274,923 4 4 0:2 2:0 318731 637461
41 New Hampshire 1,235,786 4 4 0:2 0:2 308947 617893
42 Hawaii 1,211,537 4 4 2:0 2:0 302884 605768
43 Rhode Island 1,048,319 4 4 1:1 2:0 262080 524195
44 Montana 904,433 4 3 1:1 0:1 301478 904433
45 Delaware 783,600 3 3 2:0 0:1 261200 783600
46 South Dakota 754,844 3 3 2:0 1:0 251615 754844
47 North Dakota 642,200 3 3 2:0 1:0 214067 642200
48 Alaska 626,932 3 3 0:2 0:1 208977 626932
49 Vermont 608,827 3 3 1:1:0* 1:0:0* 202942 608827
50 Wyoming 493,782 3 3 0:2 0:1 164594 493782
D.C. 563,384 3 3 0:0 0:0 187795 -
* Vermont has 1 Independent in both the Senate and the House